Difference between revisions of "Talk:Board Meeting Notes 2015-12-01"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I don't know what that number is supposed to represent. Should it actually be part of the financial report? My memory isn't good enough to recall when it was mentioned during the meeting. [[User:Justin|Justin]] ([[User talk:Justin|talk]]) 10:45, 2 December 2015 (CST) | I don't know what that number is supposed to represent. Should it actually be part of the financial report? My memory isn't good enough to recall when it was mentioned during the meeting. [[User:Justin|Justin]] ([[User talk:Justin|talk]]) 10:45, 2 December 2015 (CST) | ||
| − | : This was put in the agenda a while back as an anti-embezzlement measure. The board was supposed to review all recent bank and PayPal transactions at each meeting to look for anything suspicious. ATM cash withdrawals, payments to taxi companies or restaurants, etc. would all be red flags. It wasn't done by the 2015 board. It's also not supposed to be answered with a number; I'm guessing that's an account balance. --[[User:Rdpierce|Rdpierce]] ([[User talk:Rdpierce|talk]]) 14:21, 3 December 2015 (CST) | + | : This was put in the agenda a while back as an anti-embezzlement measure. The board was supposed to review all recent bank and PayPal transactions at each meeting to look for anything suspicious. ATM cash withdrawals, payments to taxi companies or restaurants, etc. would all be red flags. It wasn't done by the 2015 board. It's also not supposed to be answered with a number; I'm guessing that's an account balance that really belongs in the financial report. --[[User:Rdpierce|Rdpierce]] ([[User talk:Rdpierce|talk]]) 14:21, 3 December 2015 (CST) |
Revision as of 20:22, 3 December 2015
I'm just trying to reorganize this page so that the notes from the meeting are actually in the minutes section instead of mixed with the agenda. I found the following:
* Review the paypal and banking transactions. $18,946.89
I don't know what that number is supposed to represent. Should it actually be part of the financial report? My memory isn't good enough to recall when it was mentioned during the meeting. Justin (talk) 10:45, 2 December 2015 (CST)
- This was put in the agenda a while back as an anti-embezzlement measure. The board was supposed to review all recent bank and PayPal transactions at each meeting to look for anything suspicious. ATM cash withdrawals, payments to taxi companies or restaurants, etc. would all be red flags. It wasn't done by the 2015 board. It's also not supposed to be answered with a number; I'm guessing that's an account balance that really belongs in the financial report. --Rdpierce (talk) 14:21, 3 December 2015 (CST)