Difference between revisions of "Talk:Childcare"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Pumping Station: One is not the place to gather a large group of toddlers and preschoolers. --[[User:Dbever|Dbever]] ([[User talk:Dbever|talk]]) 22:10, 16 June 2015 (CDT) | Pumping Station: One is not the place to gather a large group of toddlers and preschoolers. --[[User:Dbever|Dbever]] ([[User talk:Dbever|talk]]) 22:10, 16 June 2015 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | If this would not be happening at PS1, or not be provided by ps1, as it sounds like from the page (although I'm not sure), why would PS1 want to get involved in it? It's a gigantic liability nightmare. In Illinois a waiver of liability for a child that is under the care or supervision of a person other than their parent or guardian is completely invalid and won't hold up in court, from my recollection. I can't cite statute for it, but this was the original reason behind not allowing minor members at ps1 when we passed that policy years ago by member vote.--[[User:Toba|Toba]] ([[User talk:Toba|talk]]) 22:13, 16 June 2015 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 03:13, 17 June 2015
Possible alts
Member's as volunteer caretakers. Potential issues: more complicated insurance issues maybe?
No thank you.
Pumping Station: One is not the place to gather a large group of toddlers and preschoolers. --Dbever (talk) 22:10, 16 June 2015 (CDT)
If this would not be happening at PS1, or not be provided by ps1, as it sounds like from the page (although I'm not sure), why would PS1 want to get involved in it? It's a gigantic liability nightmare. In Illinois a waiver of liability for a child that is under the care or supervision of a person other than their parent or guardian is completely invalid and won't hold up in court, from my recollection. I can't cite statute for it, but this was the original reason behind not allowing minor members at ps1 when we passed that policy years ago by member vote.--Toba (talk) 22:13, 16 June 2015 (CDT)