Difference between revisions of "Talk:Library Supplies Vote"

From Pumping Station One
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎skittles is awesome: mostly, just watching this page)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Skittles is Awesome ==
 
== Skittles is Awesome ==
 
Skittles is awesome, she organized the PS:One books.  I feel no doubt she will be able to put supplies to good use. --[[User:Hef|Hef]] ([[User talk:Hef|talk]]) 12:49, 12 March 2014 (CDT)
 
Skittles is awesome, she organized the PS:One books.  I feel no doubt she will be able to put supplies to good use. --[[User:Hef|Hef]] ([[User talk:Hef|talk]]) 12:49, 12 March 2014 (CDT)
 +
 +
==Electronic logging/ISBN tags==
 +
Might it make more sense to get a scanner that reads ISBNs so we can have an electronic database and tracking?  Or is that part of the scope of what Skittles is planning?  (Or, if the collection is small enough, maybe leaving it old-school is more efficient than trying to make an electronic solution.)
 +
 +
==Databases==
 +
When I was in grad school, our library had access to a number of online databases (the usual stuff like Lexis/Nexis but also science-specific/special interest ones).  Does it make sense to have a discussion about purchasing membership in some databases of interest/use to the membership for use by the membership collectively?  I would imagine there are engineering and other such databases that members might get use from.
 +
 +
==Scope of Collection==
 +
Do we want to include the Area-specific books in the library catalog/checkout system?--[[User:A. Catherine Noon|A. Catherine Noon]]

Revision as of 18:07, 12 March 2014

Skittles is Awesome

Skittles is awesome, she organized the PS:One books. I feel no doubt she will be able to put supplies to good use. --Hef (talk) 12:49, 12 March 2014 (CDT)

Electronic logging/ISBN tags

Might it make more sense to get a scanner that reads ISBNs so we can have an electronic database and tracking? Or is that part of the scope of what Skittles is planning? (Or, if the collection is small enough, maybe leaving it old-school is more efficient than trying to make an electronic solution.)

Databases

When I was in grad school, our library had access to a number of online databases (the usual stuff like Lexis/Nexis but also science-specific/special interest ones). Does it make sense to have a discussion about purchasing membership in some databases of interest/use to the membership for use by the membership collectively? I would imagine there are engineering and other such databases that members might get use from.

Scope of Collection

Do we want to include the Area-specific books in the library catalog/checkout system?--A. Catherine Noon