Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vote on 3 Policy Labels"

From Pumping Station: One Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(expiry: new section)
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
I like Joel's suggestion about the policies being in effect until member quorum is met rather than the language here about automatic expiry.
 
I like Joel's suggestion about the policies being in effect until member quorum is met rather than the language here about automatic expiry.
 +
 +
* Agreed. --[[User:Glenn|Glenn]] 23 April 2015

Revision as of 10:34, 23 April 2015

precedence?

I am curious. Is there any precedent to those policies? In other words, have any other policies ever been enacted by the board with no membership vote? --Lucas (talk) 11:32, 22 April 2015 (CDT)

  • None that I am aware of. The precedent would be for these types of policies to go before the membership and be voted on with an explanation as to why they are needed. --Hef (talk) 09:05, 23 April 2015 (CDT)

Inflamitory Title

The title should be changed to something more neutral, such as Vote on Setting Policies. --Sylphiae (talk) 13:31, 22 April 2015 (CDT)

  • Good call. I probably should have gotten into a more neutral mood before writing the first pass of this proposal. (The title has been changed_ --Hef (talk) 09:05, 23 April 2015 (CDT)

expiry

I like Joel's suggestion about the policies being in effect until member quorum is met rather than the language here about automatic expiry.

  • Agreed. --Glenn 23 April 2015