Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vote on 3 Policy Labels"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→expiry) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
* Agreed. --[[User:Glenn|Glenn]] 23 April 2015 | * Agreed. --[[User:Glenn|Glenn]] 23 April 2015 | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | "expires 3 weeks after being voted on" does not specify that the board of directors voted on it versus membership voting on it. skm | ||
Revision as of 15:37, 23 April 2015
precedence?
I am curious. Is there any precedent to those policies? In other words, have any other policies ever been enacted by the board with no membership vote? --Lucas (talk) 11:32, 22 April 2015 (CDT)
- None that I am aware of. The precedent would be for these types of policies to go before the membership and be voted on with an explanation as to why they are needed. --Hef (talk) 09:05, 23 April 2015 (CDT)
Inflamitory Title
The title should be changed to something more neutral, such as Vote on Setting Policies. --Sylphiae (talk) 13:31, 22 April 2015 (CDT)
- Good call. I probably should have gotten into a more neutral mood before writing the first pass of this proposal. (The title has been changed_ --Hef (talk) 09:05, 23 April 2015 (CDT)
expiry
I like Joel's suggestion about the policies being in effect until member quorum is met rather than the language here about automatic expiry.
- Agreed. --Glenn 23 April 2015
"expires 3 weeks after being voted on" does not specify that the board of directors voted on it versus membership voting on it. skm