Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vote on Space Planning"

From Pumping Station One
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
:I don't object. We could put it on the agenda for the next board meeting. [[User:Skm|Skm]] ([[User talk:Skm|talk]]) 16:31, 7 December 2015 (CST)
 
:I don't object. We could put it on the agenda for the next board meeting. [[User:Skm|Skm]] ([[User talk:Skm|talk]]) 16:31, 7 December 2015 (CST)
 +
 +
::I agree that a vote isn't required but I think having the members endorse or reject a process would be a good idea. Is holding a vote a lot of effort?  [[User:Mskilton|Mskilton]] ([[User talk:Mskilton|talk]]) 21:41, 7 December 2015 (CST)

Revision as of 03:42, 8 December 2015

Goal

As written, I'm not sure this vote is required? It'd be a lot less overhead if someone just came to a board meeting and laid out what they expect the committee to look like, and we (the board) could create one without a member vote. --Dbever (talk) 10:37, 7 December 2015 (CST)

I don't object. We could put it on the agenda for the next board meeting. Skm (talk) 16:31, 7 December 2015 (CST)
I agree that a vote isn't required but I think having the members endorse or reject a process would be a good idea. Is holding a vote a lot of effort? Mskilton (talk) 21:41, 7 December 2015 (CST)