Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vote on Space Planning"

From Pumping Station: One Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
::I agree that a vote isn't required but I think having the members endorse or reject a process would be a good idea. Is holding a vote a lot of effort?  [[User:Mskilton|Mskilton]] ([[User talk:Mskilton|talk]]) 21:41, 7 December 2015 (CST)
 
::I agree that a vote isn't required but I think having the members endorse or reject a process would be a good idea. Is holding a vote a lot of effort?  [[User:Mskilton|Mskilton]] ([[User talk:Mskilton|talk]]) 21:41, 7 December 2015 (CST)
 +
 +
:::Running a vote definitely adds overhead (especially with this year's changes to how votes run). I also think we'll be harder-pressed than normal to reach quorum the week of Christmas. Anything this committee comes up with would probably be presented as a member vote, right? The committee certainly wouldn't be closed-door, so hopefully everyone would have a chance to participate in planning in some capacity, but the details of that participation I will happily leave to members of the committee. --[[User:Dbever|Dbever]] ([[User talk:Dbever|talk]]) 08:39, 8 December 2015 (CST)

Revision as of 09:39, 8 December 2015

Goal

As written, I'm not sure this vote is required? It'd be a lot less overhead if someone just came to a board meeting and laid out what they expect the committee to look like, and we (the board) could create one without a member vote. --Dbever (talk) 10:37, 7 December 2015 (CST)

I don't object. We could put it on the agenda for the next board meeting. Skm (talk) 16:31, 7 December 2015 (CST)
I agree that a vote isn't required but I think having the members endorse or reject a process would be a good idea. Is holding a vote a lot of effort? Mskilton (talk) 21:41, 7 December 2015 (CST)
Running a vote definitely adds overhead (especially with this year's changes to how votes run). I also think we'll be harder-pressed than normal to reach quorum the week of Christmas. Anything this committee comes up with would probably be presented as a member vote, right? The committee certainly wouldn't be closed-door, so hopefully everyone would have a chance to participate in planning in some capacity, but the details of that participation I will happily leave to members of the committee. --Dbever (talk) 08:39, 8 December 2015 (CST)