53
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20:
Line 20: + + + +
Talk:Vote to Refresh PS:One Server Hardware (view source)
Revision as of 15:32, 19 March 2015
, 15:32, 19 March 2015no edit summary
: We're concerned about power consumption at the rack, for the sake of our power conditioning equipment. There are a number of more fruitful avenues for reducing overall energy requirements of the space (like our uninsulated entryway, or how people leave the back door open even when we're heating the shop). A more thoroughly-planned distribution of switches throughout the space could make our network infrastructure much more useful and robust. --[[User:Dbever|Dbever]] ([[User talk:Dbever|talk]]) 19:11, 18 March 2015 (CDT)
: We're concerned about power consumption at the rack, for the sake of our power conditioning equipment. There are a number of more fruitful avenues for reducing overall energy requirements of the space (like our uninsulated entryway, or how people leave the back door open even when we're heating the shop). A more thoroughly-planned distribution of switches throughout the space could make our network infrastructure much more useful and robust. --[[User:Dbever|Dbever]] ([[User talk:Dbever|talk]]) 19:11, 18 March 2015 (CDT)
I support this, but want to point out the obvious: if we get only one server, we won't have any fail over capability. Do we need fail over? Probably not, but it's a good architecture. --[[User:Glenn|Glenn]] ([[User talk:Glenn|talk]]) 10:30, 19 Mar 19 2015 (CDT)
We should consider a PAIR of backup drives. BackBlaze has [https://www.backblaze.com/blog/best-hard-drive/ hard drive failure stats]. I use [http://www.amazon.com/HGST-Touro-Desktop-External-0S03396/dp/B007K4HA0W HGST Turo 4 TB] drives. --[[User:Glenn|Glenn]] ([[User talk:Glenn|talk]]) 10:30, 19 Mar 19 2015 (CDT)
== What is needed to get this moving? ==
== What is needed to get this moving? ==