Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vote to Replace Google Groups with Discourse Forum"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Wording is jargony: new section) |
(→Costs: new section) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[User:Skm|Skm]] ([[User talk:Skm|talk]]) 10:14, 22 September 2017 (CDT) | [[User:Skm|Skm]] ([[User talk:Skm|talk]]) 10:14, 22 September 2017 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Costs == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Wouldn't hosting be a recurring cost? [[User:Skm|Skm]] ([[User talk:Skm|talk]]) 10:15, 22 September 2017 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why does the cost need to be specified? It sounds like something that could fit in the CTO budget. [[User:Skm|Skm]] ([[User talk:Skm|talk]]) 10:15, 22 September 2017 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:15, 22 September 2017
Wording is jargony
'implement' isn't the best word choice. It has a technical meaning that doesn't fit here.
I suggest replacing it with 'use' and 'run'.
- "We authorize the board to use Discourse for the main member forum..."
- "spend up to $500 to run Discourse".
Skm (talk) 10:14, 22 September 2017 (CDT)
Costs
Wouldn't hosting be a recurring cost? Skm (talk) 10:15, 22 September 2017 (CDT)
Why does the cost need to be specified? It sounds like something that could fit in the CTO budget. Skm (talk) 10:15, 22 September 2017 (CDT)