Difference between revisions of "Vote on 3 Policy Labels"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Bry moved page Vote to Reiterate that the Membership Runs the Organization to Vote on Setting Policies: name currently sucks) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
* [[Board_Policy_on_Events]] | * [[Board_Policy_on_Events]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | Quite a few people have said that they want both the membership to run the space, and also want the BoD to have the ability to protect it quickly. If the BoD can create temporary policies than need to be validated by a membership vote later, that seems to satisfy both of these interests. | |
== Language == | == Language == | ||
Revision as of 13:59, 23 April 2015
Sponsors
- hef
History
- 2015-04-22 - Inception
- 2015-04-29 - Discussion (planned)
- 2015-05-06 - Language Lockdown (planned)
- 2015-05-13 - Vote (planned)
Background
It's my opinion that the following three pseudo policies are invalid because they were not voted on by the general membership:
Quite a few people have said that they want both the membership to run the space, and also want the BoD to have the ability to protect it quickly. If the BoD can create temporary policies than need to be validated by a membership vote later, that seems to satisfy both of these interests.
Language
Policy changes in the space are not suitable as a vote of the directors, and must be voted on by the general membership.