Difference between revisions of "Vote on 3 Policy Labels"

From Pumping Station One
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
 
(33 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
* 2015-04-22 - Inception
 
* 2015-04-22 - Inception
−
* 2015-04-29 - Discussion (planned)
+
* 2015-05-05 - Discussion w/ BoD
−
* 2015-05-12 - Language Lockdown (planned)
+
* 2015-05-07 - Draft 3 rewrite
−
* 2015-05-19 - Vote (planned)
+
* 2015-07-13 - Draft 4
 +
* 2015-07-28 - Language Lockdown
 +
* 2015-08-04 - Vote (planned)
  
 
== Background ==
 
== Background ==
  
−
There has been an idea going around that the Board of Directors can create board voted policy if it meets certain qualifications.
+
The membership and the board are not two distinct groups.
  
−
Under the section: [[bylaws#Issues Proper for a Vote of the Directors]]
+
If a non-board member of the organization wanted to work on insurance compliance, I would be inclined to encourage them.
  
−
There is a specific line:
+
The following 3 pages could be seen as an obstacle to that.
  
−
    to fulfill any obligations to ensure the health of the organization.
+
* [[Board Policy on Animals]]
 +
* [[Board Policy on Alcohol]]
 +
* [[Board Policy on Events]]
  
−
* The word "obligations" and the phrase "health of the organization" can be interpreted in a lot of ways.
 
−
* There are a lot of ways a policy can be written that fulfill obligations, and the membership should be guaranteed, a hand in that process, as we are with member votes
 
−
* A policy produced by a minority of the membership without feedback from the general membership can not hope to attain the the same rigor in quality standards that a membership vote has.
 
−
* A policy created may not be tied to the reason it was created, and may not self invalidate if that reason changes. e.g. A contractual agreement expires.
 
  
−
=== Misconceptions ===
+
Members serving on the board generally ensure insurance obligations are being fulfilled. However, anyone who wants to work on insurance compliance should be able to, and is strongly encouraged to work with other members already working on the issues.
  
−
* This proposal does not grant the ability to vote to break the law. See [[Bylaws#Issues Proper for a Vote of the Membership]].
+
The policy structure at PS:One can be convoluted and difficult to follow, so I write a hand-dandy guide available here: [[Understanding Policy Structure at PS:One]]
−
* If the space has made contractual obligations in the past, those contractual obligations continue to hold, and additional policy is optional.
 
  
 
== Language ==
 
== Language ==
  
−
*  Member's of pumping station one will continue to honor contractual agreements of the space.
+
The following 3 policies are member curated policies.
  
 +
* [[Board Policy on Animals]]
 +
* [[Board Policy on Alcohol]]
 +
* [[Board Policy on Events]]
  
 
[[Category:Votes]]
 
[[Category:Votes]]
 
[[Category:2015 Votes]]
 
[[Category:2015 Votes]]

Latest revision as of 04:14, 29 July 2015

Sponsors

  • hef

History

  • 2015-04-22 - Inception
  • 2015-05-05 - Discussion w/ BoD
  • 2015-05-07 - Draft 3 rewrite
  • 2015-07-13 - Draft 4
  • 2015-07-28 - Language Lockdown
  • 2015-08-04 - Vote (planned)

Background

The membership and the board are not two distinct groups.

If a non-board member of the organization wanted to work on insurance compliance, I would be inclined to encourage them.

The following 3 pages could be seen as an obstacle to that.


Members serving on the board generally ensure insurance obligations are being fulfilled. However, anyone who wants to work on insurance compliance should be able to, and is strongly encouraged to work with other members already working on the issues.

The policy structure at PS:One can be convoluted and difficult to follow, so I write a hand-dandy guide available here: Understanding Policy Structure at PS:One

Language

The following 3 policies are member curated policies.

Retrieved from "https://ps1.mywikis.wiki/w/index.php?title=Vote_on_3_Policy_Labels&oldid=24811"