Difference between revisions of "Vote on 3 Policy Labels"

From Pumping Station One
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(27 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
* 2015-04-22 - Inception
 
* 2015-04-22 - Inception
* 2015-04-29 - Discussion (planned)
+
* 2015-05-05 - Discussion w/ BoD
* 2015-05-12 - Language Lockdown (planned)
+
* 2015-05-07 - Draft 3 rewrite
* 2015-05-19 - Vote (planned)
+
* 2015-07-13 - Draft 4
 +
* 2015-07-28 - Language Lockdown
 +
* 2015-08-04 - Vote (planned)
  
 
== Background ==
 
== Background ==
  
=== The Issue ===
+
The membership and the board are not two distinct groups.
  
There was an attempt at enforcement of a contractual obligation of the space by making a board voted policy.  The policies are fundamentally sound, but the objectives of the policies can be attained more efficiently:
+
If a non-board member of the organization wanted to work on insurance compliance, I would be inclined to encourage them.
  
# If no policy is required to follow existing contractual obligations of the space.
+
The following 3 pages could be seen as an obstacle to that.
# If the language can be updated by members familiar with the area of law of best practices.
 
  
Concern has been expressed about how to communicate newly discovered caveats to contractual obligations.  This information be disseminated the same way votes are:
+
* [[Board Policy on Animals]]
 +
* [[Board Policy on Alcohol]]
 +
* [[Board Policy on Events]]
  
* The mailing list
 
* Signage near affected areas
 
* The wiki
 
* Meeting notes.
 
  
=== Disadvantages of votes to obey contractual obligations ===
+
Members serving on the board generally ensure insurance obligations are being fulfilled. However, anyone who wants to work on insurance compliance should be able to, and is strongly encouraged to work with other members already working on the issues.
  
* Voting to comply with a contractual agreement carries the implication that a vote is required to comply with a contractual obligation.
+
The policy structure at PS:One can be convoluted and difficult to follow, so I write a hand-dandy guide available here: [[Understanding Policy Structure at PS:One]]
* Vote language for contractual compliance is often imprecise, and difficult to correct.
 
* The bylaws specifiy that Director votes are permitted granted that they [[Bylaws#Issues_Proper_for_a_Vote_of_the_Directors |fulfill obligations that ensure the health of the organizaton]], which implies that the minimum impact is required for the vote issue, but the minumum impact is not always desireable.
 
* Member participation in the space's operations should be encouraged.
 
  
=== Noteworthy caveats ===
+
== Language ==
  
* Members do not have the ability to vote to break the law. See [[Bylaws#Issues Proper for a Vote of the Membership]].
+
The following 3 policies are member curated policies.
 
 
== Language ==
 
  
* Member's of pumping station one will continue to honor contractual agreements of the space.
+
* [[Board Policy on Animals]]
* All member's of PS:One may curate documentation on contractual obligations of Pumping Station One, be it in electronic or hard copy form.
+
* [[Board Policy on Alcohol]]
 +
* [[Board Policy on Events]]
  
 
[[Category:Votes]]
 
[[Category:Votes]]
 
[[Category:2015 Votes]]
 
[[Category:2015 Votes]]

Latest revision as of 04:14, 29 July 2015

Sponsors

  • hef

History

  • 2015-04-22 - Inception
  • 2015-05-05 - Discussion w/ BoD
  • 2015-05-07 - Draft 3 rewrite
  • 2015-07-13 - Draft 4
  • 2015-07-28 - Language Lockdown
  • 2015-08-04 - Vote (planned)

Background

The membership and the board are not two distinct groups.

If a non-board member of the organization wanted to work on insurance compliance, I would be inclined to encourage them.

The following 3 pages could be seen as an obstacle to that.


Members serving on the board generally ensure insurance obligations are being fulfilled. However, anyone who wants to work on insurance compliance should be able to, and is strongly encouraged to work with other members already working on the issues.

The policy structure at PS:One can be convoluted and difficult to follow, so I write a hand-dandy guide available here: Understanding Policy Structure at PS:One

Language

The following 3 policies are member curated policies.