Difference between revisions of "Vote on 3 Policy Labels"

From Pumping Station One
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
* 2015-05-07 - Draft 3 rewrite
 
* 2015-05-07 - Draft 3 rewrite
 
* 2015-07-13 - Draft 4
 
* 2015-07-13 - Draft 4
* 2015-07-21 - Language Lockdown (planned)
+
* 2015-07-28 - Language Lockdown
* 2015-07-28 - Vote (planned)
+
* 2015-08-04 - Vote (planned)
  
 
== Background ==
 
== Background ==
  
The following "policies" are improper for a vote of directors, as they deal with insurance compliance, and not the health of the organization.
+
The membership and the board are not two distinct groups.
 +
 
 +
If a non-board member of the organization wanted to work on insurance compliance, I would be inclined to encourage them.
 +
 
 +
The following 3 pages could be seen as an obstacle to that.
  
 
* [[Board Policy on Animals]]
 
* [[Board Policy on Animals]]
Line 20: Line 24:
 
* [[Board Policy on Events]]
 
* [[Board Policy on Events]]
  
and are ineffective for controlling member behavior inside the space. This vote is to relabel those votes as JFDI member contributed policy, and allow them to be modified as appropriate for a given situation.
 
  
 +
Members serving on the board generally ensure insurance obligations are being fulfilled. However, anyone who wants to work on insurance compliance should be able to, and is strongly encouraged to work with other members already working on the issues.
  
 
The policy structure at PS:One can be convoluted and difficult to follow, so I write a hand-dandy guide available here: [[Understanding Policy Structure at PS:One]]
 
The policy structure at PS:One can be convoluted and difficult to follow, so I write a hand-dandy guide available here: [[Understanding Policy Structure at PS:One]]

Latest revision as of 04:14, 29 July 2015

Sponsors

  • hef

History

  • 2015-04-22 - Inception
  • 2015-05-05 - Discussion w/ BoD
  • 2015-05-07 - Draft 3 rewrite
  • 2015-07-13 - Draft 4
  • 2015-07-28 - Language Lockdown
  • 2015-08-04 - Vote (planned)

Background

The membership and the board are not two distinct groups.

If a non-board member of the organization wanted to work on insurance compliance, I would be inclined to encourage them.

The following 3 pages could be seen as an obstacle to that.


Members serving on the board generally ensure insurance obligations are being fulfilled. However, anyone who wants to work on insurance compliance should be able to, and is strongly encouraged to work with other members already working on the issues.

The policy structure at PS:One can be convoluted and difficult to follow, so I write a hand-dandy guide available here: Understanding Policy Structure at PS:One

Language

The following 3 policies are member curated policies.