Difference between revisions of "Vote to Replace Google Groups with Discourse Forum"

From Pumping Station: One Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Background)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Sponsors ==
 
== Sponsors ==
  
* Andrew C
+
* Andrew Camardella
 +
* Alex Berkowitz
  
 
== History ==
 
== History ==
Line 27: Line 28:
  
 
==Cost==
 
==Cost==
As the main communication channel Discourse should be hosted externally to Pumping Station: One to prioritize up-time. A quick review shows that hosting costs are on the order of $200 for the year. There is a possibility of having it set up for $99 for us but it's been done in the past and may be done again. The CTO would be responsible for including future maintenance costs in the their annual budget.
+
As we already have an instance of Discourse running, and hosting costs are already included in the CTO's budget, there are no new costs to the organization that this change will introduce.
 
   
 
   
 
== Language ==
 
== Language ==
Line 33: Line 34:
 
* We authorize the board to use Discourse as the main member forum sanctioned by Pumping Station: One, NFP.
 
* We authorize the board to use Discourse as the main member forum sanctioned by Pumping Station: One, NFP.
 
* We authorize the board to lock out the Public and Private Google Groups from additional posts after as long as it remains available to the membership for review and historical information.
 
* We authorize the board to lock out the Public and Private Google Groups from additional posts after as long as it remains available to the membership for review and historical information.
* We authorize the board to spend up to $350 to install and maintain a cloud version of Discourse for FY 2017/18.
 
  
 
== Results ==
 
== Results ==

Revision as of 11:11, 18 November 2019

Sponsors

  • Andrew Camardella
  • Alex Berkowitz

History

  • Announced:
  • Language locked:
  • Voted on:

Background

The Private Google Groups is the main form of communication for members, and accounts for the majority of communications with regards to authorizations and pertinent space information. Due to it's flat and simple format there are many issues that arise with this communication channel. In particular:

  • all messages are sent to everyone (you can't tune out discussions you aren't interested in).
  • sorting and finding specific information is difficult.
  • no community standards or moderation options.
  • signing up new members and removing old members is completely manual
  • low new member engagement


Discourse solves many of the issue with Google-Groups because it:

  • is a well-thought-out modern forum that is feature rich and geared specifically to generate quality civilized discussion.
  • can be used to combine our public and private google groups by using category tags with permissions.
  • has an amazing code of conduct that is reflected in the design of the forum and that dovetails with our own policies.
  • works through email clients just like Google Groups does.
  • can interface with our member database which means new users are automatically added when they create their PS:One user account and deactivated when they leave. This automates the current process board members go through.

Cost

As we already have an instance of Discourse running, and hosting costs are already included in the CTO's budget, there are no new costs to the organization that this change will introduce.

Language

  • We authorize the board to use Discourse as the main member forum sanctioned by Pumping Station: One, NFP.
  • We authorize the board to lock out the Public and Private Google Groups from additional posts after as long as it remains available to the membership for review and historical information.

Results

Quorum: The number of votes required to have a valid vote (1/3rd of the full members must vote, check the member site. If the vote doesn't meet quorum it will have to be proposed again, and can be voted on the following week (consider campaigning for your particular vote). Yay: This is the number of members that vote but that agree with the vote language. Nay: This is the number of members that vote but that disagree with the vote language. Present: This is the total number of members that voted (physically present and by proxy) and includes those that abstained from voting.