Vote to Upgrade 3515 Lighting

Sponsors

Michael Skilton

History

• Mailing List Announcement:
• Officially Proposed:
• Voted on:
  • Quorum:
  • Yes:
  • No:
  • Abstain:
  • Discarded due to invalid proxy format:
  • Result:

Background

The lighting on the 3515 side is poor. We received alighting assessment from Ener-Light as part of ComEd's energy efficiency rebate program. As a condition of the lease, the landlord has agreed to "repair or replace" the non-working existing fluorescent fixtures. This likely leaves us with a bunch of old and inefficient lights. The landlord has agreed to chip in up to $1000, there are conditions. The Enerlight proposal has a energy savings pay back time of We need to authorize the full amount so we can be sure we can fulfill the contract terms regardless of what the landlord actually does or doesn't do.

Language

We authorize the board engage in a contract with Ener-Light and to spend up ____ to upgrade the lighting in the 3515 N. Elston portion of the building.

Vote

• Quorum:
• Yay:
• Nay:
• Abstain: