844
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 64:
Line 64: + +
no edit summary
Voting is a hassle - there are too many fingers in the pot at vote time and everyone and their aunt has something to say about the vote. By pre-approving certain expenditure via a vote we are removing the onus of creating another vote on the area host. There is no difference on the membership voting to approve a $1000 expense now or via a vote in the future especially when the expense is known about, it makes financial sense to plan for it. Votes are unplanned ad hoc expenditure which is hard to budget for! --[[User:Amishhammer|Amishhammer]] ([[User talk:Amishhammer|talk]]) 17:58, 6 January 2015 (CST)
Voting is a hassle - there are too many fingers in the pot at vote time and everyone and their aunt has something to say about the vote. By pre-approving certain expenditure via a vote we are removing the onus of creating another vote on the area host. There is no difference on the membership voting to approve a $1000 expense now or via a vote in the future especially when the expense is known about, it makes financial sense to plan for it. Votes are unplanned ad hoc expenditure which is hard to budget for! --[[User:Amishhammer|Amishhammer]] ([[User talk:Amishhammer|talk]]) 17:58, 6 January 2015 (CST)
Everyone '''should''' have something to say - that's the point of an organization run by the members. If you want to discourage discussion of the organization's expenditures, then say that. --[[User:Dbever|Dbever]] ([[User talk:Dbever|talk]]) 18:13, 6 January 2015 (CST)