Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 52: Line 52:     
Under the draft policy, it's technically possible for the Board to overrule an Area Host, and the Area Host overrules the Board, and the Board overrules the Area Host, etc. But practically, this would be a stupid move for the Area Host because the Board would likely remove the Area Host from office. I felt this situation was unlikely enough that it wasn't worth complicating the policy by setting up a more complicated decision making structure with escalation. I'm interested in hearing opinions on whether this is the right call. --[[User:Rdpierce|Rdpierce]] ([[User talk:Rdpierce|talk]]) 20:46, 13 February 2015 (CST)
 
Under the draft policy, it's technically possible for the Board to overrule an Area Host, and the Area Host overrules the Board, and the Board overrules the Area Host, etc. But practically, this would be a stupid move for the Area Host because the Board would likely remove the Area Host from office. I felt this situation was unlikely enough that it wasn't worth complicating the policy by setting up a more complicated decision making structure with escalation. I'm interested in hearing opinions on whether this is the right call. --[[User:Rdpierce|Rdpierce]] ([[User talk:Rdpierce|talk]]) 20:46, 13 February 2015 (CST)
 +
 +
I'd say keep it simple.--[[User:Bioguy|Bioguy]] ([[User talk:Bioguy|talk]]) 12:44, 14 February 2015 (CST)
    
== Ambiguity - Constraining authority for granting exceptions ==
 
== Ambiguity - Constraining authority for granting exceptions ==
62

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu