Changes

::::Jason, see the revised vote text. The policy itself is simple, and doesn't go into specifics. Resources are linked, and are not part of the policy itself. I would bet that corporations who forbid animals except service animals make sure customer service personnel who would encounter disabled customers have some kind of training so someone doesn't grill someone about their service animal and turn them away. At PS:One, any of us could host events, so in effect anyone could be in that role. I think this brings the issue to people's attention without binding the policy with specific language that may or may not be correct, or could become outdated. --[[User:Rdpierce|Rdpierce]] ([[User talk:Rdpierce|talk]]) 08:07, 5 May 2015 (CDT)

::::Jason, see the revised vote text. The policy itself is simple, and doesn't go into specifics. Resources are linked, and are not part of the policy itself. I would bet that corporations who forbid animals except service animals make sure customer service personnel who would encounter disabled customers have some kind of training so someone doesn't grill someone about their service animal and turn them away. At PS:One, any of us could host events, so in effect anyone could be in that role. I think this brings the issue to people's attention without binding the policy with specific language that may or may not be correct, or could become outdated. --[[User:Rdpierce|Rdpierce]] ([[User talk:Rdpierce|talk]]) 08:07, 5 May 2015 (CDT)

:::::This is really stupid. When is this going to be discussed at a public meeting so I can attend? [[User:Jason|Jason]] ([[User talk:Jason|talk]]) 08:31, 5 May 2015 (CDT)

:::::This is really stupid. When is this going to be discussed at a public meeting so I can attend? [[User:Jason|Jason]] ([[User talk:Jason|talk]]) 08:31, 5 May 2015 (CDT)

::::::Correction: the policy you guys already enacted is really stupid. Remove from this one a vague mention of unspecified questions and it's fine. There are no legally prohibited questions. The reason the '''organization''' ''might'' not be permitted to ask questions is completely different than why it might, as a matter of etiquette, hope members don't ask questions. Getting smart with compliance language is dumb. Just state that you comply with the law and leave it at that. We can deal with members who harass others because of their disabilities. [[User:Jason|Jason]] ([[User talk:Jason|talk]]) 08:37, 5 May 2015 (CDT)

::::::Correction: the policy you guys already enacted is really stupid. Remove from this one a vague mention of unspecified questions and it's fine. You don't really need a written policy that states that you're going to comply with the law. If you want people using service animals to feel welcome, tell them their service animals are welcome. That's better than a policy all day. There are no legally prohibited questions. The reason the '''organization''' ''might'' not be permitted to ask questions is completely different than why it might, as a matter of etiquette, hope members don't ask questions. Getting smart with compliance language is dumb. Just state that you comply with the law and leave it at that. We can deal with members who harass others because of their disabilities. [[User:Jason|Jason]] ([[User talk:Jason|talk]]) 08:37, 5 May 2015 (CDT)

== Proposed New Policy Text ==

== Proposed New Policy Text ==