Domain Admins
598
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 85:
Line 85: +
comments about whether it is relevant to have a non-policy resources section on the wiki for people who aren't familiar with ada laws about service animals.
::::::Correction: the policy you guys already enacted is really stupid. Remove from this one a vague mention of unspecified questions and it's fine. You don't really need a written policy that states that you're going to comply with the law. If you want people using service animals to feel welcome, tell them their service animals are welcome. That's better than a policy all day. There are no legally prohibited questions. The reason the '''organization''' ''might'' not be permitted to ask questions is completely different than why it might, as a matter of etiquette, hope members don't ask questions. Getting smart with compliance language is dumb. Just state that you comply with the law and leave it at that. We can deal with members who harass others because of their disabilities. [[User:Jason|Jason]] ([[User talk:Jason|talk]]) 08:37, 5 May 2015 (CDT)
::::::Correction: the policy you guys already enacted is really stupid. Remove from this one a vague mention of unspecified questions and it's fine. You don't really need a written policy that states that you're going to comply with the law. If you want people using service animals to feel welcome, tell them their service animals are welcome. That's better than a policy all day. There are no legally prohibited questions. The reason the '''organization''' ''might'' not be permitted to ask questions is completely different than why it might, as a matter of etiquette, hope members don't ask questions. Getting smart with compliance language is dumb. Just state that you comply with the law and leave it at that. We can deal with members who harass others because of their disabilities. [[User:Jason|Jason]] ([[User talk:Jason|talk]]) 08:37, 5 May 2015 (CDT)
::::::: Jason, this will probably be discussed at tonight's Board meeting. These are open to the membership. You've got some great points here. Would you be willing to stop by the meeting? --[[User:Rdpierce|Rdpierce]] ([[User talk:Rdpierce|talk]]) 09:38, 5 May 2015 (CDT)
::::::: Jason, this will probably be discussed at tonight's Board meeting. These are open to the membership. You've got some great points here. Would you be willing to stop by the meeting? --[[User:Rdpierce|Rdpierce]] ([[User talk:Rdpierce|talk]]) 09:38, 5 May 2015 (CDT)
::::::: Jason, you didn't come by the board meeting, and I didn't follow up here because I was waiting for f2f comments. I'll add a comment here. To follow up from Ryan, I got a little training at a job because I'd be interviewing people and I don't remember exactly what questions they told us were verboten, but they did cover some. I think at the space it's fuzzy since people aren't staff and aren't interviewing people for jobs. Anyway, originally I asked that we only make a policy that indicates service animals are welcome according to laws x,y,z but compromised to allow the extra language after some board discussion. I'm still not certain whether to include resources about that outside of a policy being that we don't interview people as paid staff. The board interviews people for non-paid positions.
== Proposed New Policy Text ==
== Proposed New Policy Text ==