Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎kickstarter: new section
Line 1: Line 1:  
There are two votes proposing kickstarter-style crowdfunding campaigns, complete with physical backer rewards. Who is expected to fulfill these rewards? Just laying this at the feet of the board without specifying a person or persons committed to making sure things get done seems presumptuous. Running a crowdfunding campaign is a lot of work, and voting to put that responsibility directly on the board seems like a bad idea to me. --[[User:Dbever|Dbever]] ([[User talk:Dbever|talk]]) 09:19, 3 March 2016 (CST)
 
There are two votes proposing kickstarter-style crowdfunding campaigns, complete with physical backer rewards. Who is expected to fulfill these rewards? Just laying this at the feet of the board without specifying a person or persons committed to making sure things get done seems presumptuous. Running a crowdfunding campaign is a lot of work, and voting to put that responsibility directly on the board seems like a bad idea to me. --[[User:Dbever|Dbever]] ([[User talk:Dbever|talk]]) 09:19, 3 March 2016 (CST)
 +
 +
== kickstarter ==
 +
 +
I am voting no due to the kickstarter section of the vote. As Derek says, fund-raising is a lot of work and you have not assigned anyone to do it except for "the board". Fund raising falls under the aegis of the PR director. PR director is a volunteer role, so we cannot expect Ray to spend time on it as though it were a full time job. If Ray is willing to become a sponsor for this vote with the understanding that he has the time and resources to commit to running the fund-raising campaign, then my objection to this part of the vote will no longer stand. [[User:Skm|Skm]] ([[User talk:Skm|talk]]) 10:43, 3 March 2016 (CST)
Domain Admins
598

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu