833
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: + +
→No thank you.
If this would not be happening at PS1, or not be provided by ps1, as it sounds like from the page (although I'm not sure), why would PS1 want to get involved in it? It's a gigantic liability nightmare. In Illinois a waiver of liability for a child that is under the care or supervision of a person other than their parent or guardian is completely invalid and won't hold up in court, from my recollection. I can't cite statute for it, but this was the original reason behind not allowing minor members at ps1 when we passed that policy years ago by member vote.--[[User:Toba|Toba]] ([[User talk:Toba|talk]]) 22:13, 16 June 2015 (CDT)
If this would not be happening at PS1, or not be provided by ps1, as it sounds like from the page (although I'm not sure), why would PS1 want to get involved in it? It's a gigantic liability nightmare. In Illinois a waiver of liability for a child that is under the care or supervision of a person other than their parent or guardian is completely invalid and won't hold up in court, from my recollection. I can't cite statute for it, but this was the original reason behind not allowing minor members at ps1 when we passed that policy years ago by member vote.--[[User:Toba|Toba]] ([[User talk:Toba|talk]]) 22:13, 16 June 2015 (CDT)
Toba, the idea is that childcare would happen at the space for this (likely in the lounge), but this would be done through a commercial service that would provide liability insurance listing PS:One, the landlord, the board, etc. as named insured. --[[User:Rdpierce|Rdpierce]] ([[User talk:Rdpierce|talk]]) 22:22, 16 June 2015 (CDT)