Domain Admins
598
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: + + +
→Insurance Issues: added ryan's post about insurance
I don't see any reason the BoD would be responsible for finding insurance for this. But does sound like you are saying that if coverage were acquired, this would be ok --[[User:Hef|Hef]] ([[User talk:Hef|talk]]) 23:04, 16 June 2015 (CDT)
I don't see any reason the BoD would be responsible for finding insurance for this. But does sound like you are saying that if coverage were acquired, this would be ok --[[User:Hef|Hef]] ([[User talk:Hef|talk]]) 23:04, 16 June 2015 (CDT)
:I'm adding Ryan's post from the mailing list thread so that we don't lose the discussion [[User:Skm|Skm]] ([[User talk:Skm|talk]]) 12:19, 18 June 2015 (CDT)
:: ''This would need a member vote to approve it. Additionally, it would be irresponsible to do without adequate insurance, and ours is completely inadequate here. If we use a child care company that provides its own general and professional liability insurance meeting the standards set out in our lease, who will also list PS:One, its officers and directors, and the laundry list of landlord-related entities our lease requires us to include, as "additional insureds", then this becomes an entirely different matter. Then, the babysitting service's insurance, not ours, would be primary for this situation. We also would need to investigate whether the child care company's policy has the common "molestation inclusion" and whether it is issued on a "claims made" basis, both of which would be problematic.'' from [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/pumping-station-one/aNmllz1TtQM/wVEK13rtay8J Ryan's post]
== No thank you. ==
== No thank you. ==