Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:     
:Speaking of short timeline, as the vote is written there is only about 1.5 months between when the vote passes and when the authorization for funds expires. I think this is rather short. Personally, I generally forgo the expiration of vote funds entirely in the language (expecting they'll get expired at the next budget vote if necessary), but if you do want to include an expiration, I think 90 days would be more appropriate. --[[User:Justin|Justin]] ([[User talk:Justin|talk]]) 10:16, 4 May 2015 (CDT)
 
:Speaking of short timeline, as the vote is written there is only about 1.5 months between when the vote passes and when the authorization for funds expires. I think this is rather short. Personally, I generally forgo the expiration of vote funds entirely in the language (expecting they'll get expired at the next budget vote if necessary), but if you do want to include an expiration, I think 90 days would be more appropriate. --[[User:Justin|Justin]] ([[User talk:Justin|talk]]) 10:16, 4 May 2015 (CDT)
 +
 +
I also came here to voice concern about the short expiration of the spending authorization.  Given that many of the details of the vote are still up for discussion, I would like to see a tentative date for 2-3 months after the vote is scheduled to be voted on, the actual date can be set when the language is locked in.  --[[User:Kuroishi|Kuroishi]] ([[User talk:Kuroishi|talk]]) 10:51, 4 May 2015 (CDT)
Domain Admins
136

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu