62
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 86:
Line 86: + + + + +
Talk:Vote on 3 Policy Labels (view source)
Revision as of 16:55, 25 April 2015
, 16:55, 25 April 2015→Freedom to Create protected (and constrained) by Adherence to Law
* The membership is not able to vote to do anything unlawful, see [[Bylaws#Issues_Proper_for_a_Vote_of_the_Membership]] --[[User:Hef|Hef]] ([[User talk:Hef|talk]]) 11:39, 25 April 2015 (CDT)
* The membership is not able to vote to do anything unlawful, see [[Bylaws#Issues_Proper_for_a_Vote_of_the_Membership]] --[[User:Hef|Hef]] ([[User talk:Hef|talk]]) 11:39, 25 April 2015 (CDT)
* The thing I am most interested in is that the membership have the ability to apply our historically stringent process of ensuring the high quality of policies. --[[User:Hef|Hef]] ([[User talk:Hef|talk]]) 11:41, 25 April 2015 (CDT)
* The thing I am most interested in is that the membership have the ability to apply our historically stringent process of ensuring the high quality of policies. --[[User:Hef|Hef]] ([[User talk:Hef|talk]]) 11:41, 25 April 2015 (CDT)
I agree completely with your point #2. I disagree, however, on point #1, as the act of voting indicates a choice in wishing to meet contractual agreements that have already been put in place. I think we can vote to renegotiate our insurance policy, but we can't vote on whether or not we will comply with it once it has been signed, as that breaks the contract and nullifies our insurance policy.
Another point: we need definitions of what a Policy is. These three "policies" seem to me to be more like "House Rules."
--[[User:Bioguy|Bioguy]] ([[User talk:Bioguy|talk]]) 11:55, 25 April 2015 (CDT)
== Mistaken in thinking we had to pass policies ==
== Mistaken in thinking we had to pass policies ==