Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:     
:Also if we are in the power saving mode couldn't we get rid of the switches spread around (Electronics, above hot metals)? Wouldn't just running the extra lines do it? If so I would be willing to head up a line running party when this needs to be done. Maybe I am missing something and those switches are needed. --[[User:Lucas|Lucas]] ([[User talk:Lucas|talk]]) 10:23, 17 February 2015 (CST)
 
:Also if we are in the power saving mode couldn't we get rid of the switches spread around (Electronics, above hot metals)? Wouldn't just running the extra lines do it? If so I would be willing to head up a line running party when this needs to be done. Maybe I am missing something and those switches are needed. --[[User:Lucas|Lucas]] ([[User talk:Lucas|talk]]) 10:23, 17 February 2015 (CST)
 +
 +
I would recommend taking a look at what's currently in the rack to get an idea of what we would need as far as number of ports - it's kind of a shitload. Power saving is a concern in the rack specifically because our current UPS situation is dire - the less capacity we need to buy down the road, the better.
 +
 +
RE cabling infrastructure improvements - so long as such projects are tackled with some planning and forethought, I would encourage them to happen as folks see fit. --[[User:Dbever|Dbever]] ([[User talk:Dbever|talk]]) 18:35, 17 February 2015 (CST)
    
== What is needed to get this moving? ==
 
== What is needed to get this moving? ==
844

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu