388
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: +
→We need to be careful not to ruin our negotiation power.
== We need to be careful not to ruin our negotiation power. ==
== We need to be careful not to ruin our negotiation power. ==
I know that Dan (that is the name of the landlord right?) should not be privy to our discussions and votes but I would just like to see some cautionary measures not to ruin our negotiations powers. One idea I had was to have a vote to pursue the extra area then a vote on a "final draft" of terms that have been negotiated with him. I understand that the idea of two votes in the time we have could seem daunting but it may just put more pressure on Dan to give us favorable terms.--[[User:Lucas|Lucas]] ([[User talk:Lucas|talk]]) 05:14, 26 July 2015 (CDT)
I know that Dan (that is the name of the landlord right?) should not be privy to our discussions and votes but I would just like to see some cautionary measures not to ruin our negotiations powers. One idea I had was to have a vote to pursue the extra area then a vote on a "final draft" of terms that have been negotiated with him. I understand that the idea of two votes in the time we have could seem daunting but it may just put more pressure on Dan to give us favorable terms.--[[User:Lucas|Lucas]] ([[User talk:Lucas|talk]]) 05:14, 26 July 2015 (CDT)
:The suggestion that PS:One and Dan are somehow adverse such that there's any "pressure" to be exerted on him is offensive, alienating, and weird. I gather that you've never seen or negotiated a commercial lease. [[User:Jason|Jason]] ([[User talk:Jason|talk]]) 11:50, 26 July 2015 (CDT)