Difference between revisions of "Vote to Upgrade 3515 Lighting"
(Created page with "== Sponsors == Michael Skilton == History == * Mailing List Announcement: * Officially Proposed: * Voted on: ** Quorum: ** Yes: ** No: ** Abstain: ** Discarded due to inv...") |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
| − | The lighting on the 3515 side is poor. We received | + | The lighting on the 3515 side is poor. We received a lighting assessment from Ener-Light as part of ComEd's energy efficiency rebate program. |
As a condition of the lease, the landlord has agreed to "repair or replace" the non-working existing fluorescent fixtures. This likely leaves us with a bunch of old and inefficient lights. | As a condition of the lease, the landlord has agreed to "repair or replace" the non-working existing fluorescent fixtures. This likely leaves us with a bunch of old and inefficient lights. | ||
The landlord has agreed to chip in up to $1000, there are conditions. | The landlord has agreed to chip in up to $1000, there are conditions. | ||
| − | The | + | The Ener-light proposal has a energy savings pay back time of |
We need to authorize the full amount so we can be sure we can fulfill the contract terms regardless of what the landlord actually does or doesn't do. | We need to authorize the full amount so we can be sure we can fulfill the contract terms regardless of what the landlord actually does or doesn't do. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Language == | == Language == | ||
| − | We authorize the board engage in a contract with Ener-Light and to spend up | + | We authorize the board engage in a contract with Ener-Light and to spend up $2900 to upgrade the lighting in the 3515 N. Elston portion of the building. |
== Vote == | == Vote == | ||
Revision as of 21:56, 14 June 2016
Sponsors
Michael Skilton
History
- Mailing List Announcement:
- Officially Proposed:
- Voted on:
- Quorum:
- Yes:
- No:
- Abstain:
- Discarded due to invalid proxy format:
- Result:
Background
The lighting on the 3515 side is poor. We received a lighting assessment from Ener-Light as part of ComEd's energy efficiency rebate program. As a condition of the lease, the landlord has agreed to "repair or replace" the non-working existing fluorescent fixtures. This likely leaves us with a bunch of old and inefficient lights. The landlord has agreed to chip in up to $1000, there are conditions. The Ener-light proposal has a energy savings pay back time of We need to authorize the full amount so we can be sure we can fulfill the contract terms regardless of what the landlord actually does or doesn't do.
Language
We authorize the board engage in a contract with Ener-Light and to spend up $2900 to upgrade the lighting in the 3515 N. Elston portion of the building.
Vote
- Quorum:
- Yay:
- Nay:
- Abstain: