Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:     
I'm cool with this page/ method of proxy voting going away. I would like our members to be involved. But it seems that the ILCS sited requires that we allow full members to assign their proxy for up to 11 months with a single email. This will require tracking of members eligibility to vote. I reject the argument that using this page in the way that is intended is unmanageable, extra effort but not unmanageable. Mskilton
 
I'm cool with this page/ method of proxy voting going away. I would like our members to be involved. But it seems that the ILCS sited requires that we allow full members to assign their proxy for up to 11 months with a single email. This will require tracking of members eligibility to vote. I reject the argument that using this page in the way that is intended is unmanageable, extra effort but not unmanageable. Mskilton
 +
 +
If members are interested in assigning proxies, removing their ability to vote or anything else, they should send that information to vote@. I will do what I can to keep track of this, but a wiki page that's updated (and falls out of date) with no fanfare is not going to work. --[[User:Dbever|Dbever]] ([[User talk:Dbever|talk]]) 11:50, 19 February 2014 (CST)
844

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Navigation menu