3,430
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 191:
Line 191: − − == Dialog == − − We appreciate that this dialogue is happening. We know this is a long e-mail - thanks for bearing with us. We know everyone wants a policy that is in the best interest of the space. (Ryan/Elizabeth)
Talk:Vote to rework membership points (view source)
Revision as of 03:49, 21 October 2014
, 03:49, 21 October 2014no edit summary
* several people have expressed that they feel area hosts should be able to get points for doing stuff outside there area. I, need to reconsider my stance on this. --[[User:Hef|Hef]] ([[User talk:Hef|talk]]) 21:54, 20 October 2014 (CDT)
* several people have expressed that they feel area hosts should be able to get points for doing stuff outside there area. I, need to reconsider my stance on this. --[[User:Hef|Hef]] ([[User talk:Hef|talk]]) 21:54, 20 October 2014 (CDT)
*. (Ryan) Under the policy language, change the Eligibility section to remove the statement "Area hosts are not eligible for member points." There is already language in the Area Hosts and Volunteer Positions policy that will suffice.
*. (Ryan) Under the policy language, change the Eligibility section to remove the statement "Area hosts are not eligible for member points." There is already language in the Area Hosts and Volunteer Positions policy that will suffice.
== What qualifies as a "class"? ==
== What qualifies as a "class"? ==