833
edits
Changes
From Pumping Station One
Talk:Membership Rewards Points Vote (view source)
Revision as of 18:58, 16 October 2014
, 18:58, 16 October 2014→Class Size
I'm actually opposed to 'discretion' for some things. If the policy outlines what can earn a member point, I absolutely don't want to talk about it if someone meets those requirements. There's nothing I hate more than discussing whether or not someone should receive a point for teaching a class. It's a gigantic waste of time. Make the requirements reasonable, and minimize the time investment by the board. --[[User:Dbever|Dbever]] ([[User talk:Dbever|talk]]) 10:37, 16 October 2014 (CDT)
I'm actually opposed to 'discretion' for some things. If the policy outlines what can earn a member point, I absolutely don't want to talk about it if someone meets those requirements. There's nothing I hate more than discussing whether or not someone should receive a point for teaching a class. It's a gigantic waste of time. Make the requirements reasonable, and minimize the time investment by the board. --[[User:Dbever|Dbever]] ([[User talk:Dbever|talk]]) 10:37, 16 October 2014 (CDT)
Derek, I'm amenable to raising the limit somewhat. Still, I was thinking of your lighting class where you brought a large amount of equipment and only two people showed. That sucked. Would you support splitting the difference and calling it two? Justin, we have had an automatic point structure for years, and I personally haven't seen anyone abuse it. Nobody plans classes with the intent of few people showing just to make member points. While on one hand I don't want to add even more text to this, would you feel more comfortable if the Board could suspend automatic awards for members they feel are abusing the process?
--[[User:Rdpierce|Rdpierce]] ([[User talk:Rdpierce|talk]]) 13:58, 16 October 2014 (CDT)
