1,183
edits
Changes
From Pumping Station One
→pointless or dangerous
::The Board enacted the three policies it did to fulfill PS:One's obligations, which the Bylaws explicitly permits. --[[User:Rdpierce|Rdpierce]] ([[User talk:Rdpierce|talk]]) 12:09, 5 May 2015 (CDT)
::The Board enacted the three policies it did to fulfill PS:One's obligations, which the Bylaws explicitly permits. --[[User:Rdpierce|Rdpierce]] ([[User talk:Rdpierce|talk]]) 12:09, 5 May 2015 (CDT)
:::Whether or not we have a policy will not affect whether or not someone will sue us, and I still haven't seen any guarantee that having the policy means that the insurance company will still cover us if an animal does come in. Furthermore, having a policy in place will not prevent someone from actually bringing an animal into the space. Really, it doesn't. We don't need a policy in place to tell people that their not allowed to have animals in the space either.
::: Now, if by some chance someone does manage to sneak an animal past our tight security into the space and have it bite someone before we have a chance to kick them out (perhaps even as part of the incident where we try to remove the animal, as is likely), what might happen? Will the insurance company go through our bylaws and policies to see that we totally had a policy saying that person couldn't bring an animal in? No, they will not do that. They don't care what our policies are. What they will care about is that we made a good faith effort to remove the animal from the premises as soon as we were made aware of the situation. For this, it doesn't matter that we have a policy. If we want to tell someone their pet can't be in the space, all we have to say is "our insurance doesn't allow us to have animals in the space." --[[User:Justin|Justin]] ([[User talk:Justin|talk]]) 12:24, 5 May 2015 (CDT)
(B) Proposed vote does not pass
(B) Proposed vote does not pass
