Difference between revisions of "Vote on 3 Policy Labels"

From Pumping Station One
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
m (Bot: Cosmetic changes)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
== Background ==
 
== Background ==
  
−
What this vote aims to do is remove the need, and therefore ability, for the board of directors to pass voted policy. If the rules of insurance are implicitly enforced, there is no need for extra policy. That said, documentation on the extra rulesets implied by insurance policy compliance is a good idea. The membership has traditionally been very very good at documenting these types of things clearly, finding weakness and either exploiting or repairing them.
+
The following "policies" are improper for a vote of directors, as they deal with insurance compliance, and not the health of the organization.
  
−
This vote aims to both protect the organization, and ensure that membership involvement stays high.
+
* [[Board Policy on Animals]]
 +
* [[Board_Policy_on_Alcohol]]
 +
* [[Board_Policy_on_Events]]
  
−
=== Information Dissemination ===
+
and are ineffective for controlling member behavior inside the space. This vote is to relabel those votes as JFDI member contributed policy, and allow them to be modified as appropriate for a given situation.
  
−
Concern has been expressed about how to communicate newly discovered caveats to contractual obligations. This information should be disseminated the same way votes are:
 
  
−
* The mailing list
+
== Language ==
−
* Signage near affected areas
 
−
* The wiki
 
−
* Meeting notes.
 
  
−
=== Disadvantages of Votes to Honor Specific Contractual Obligations ===
+
The following 3 polciies are cute, but are better labeled as JFDI policy:
  
−
* Voting to comply with a contractual agreement carries the implication that a vote is required to comply with a contractual obligation.
+
* [[Board Policy on Animals]]
−
* Vote language for contractual compliance is often imprecise, and difficult to correct.
+
* [[Board_Policy_on_Alcohol]]
−
* The bylaws specifiy that Director votes are permitted granted that they [[Bylaws#Issues Proper for a Vote of the Directors|fulfill obligations that ensure the health of the organizaton]], which implies that the minimum impact is required for the vote issue, but the minumum impact is not always desireable.
+
* [[Board_Policy_on_Events]]
−
* Member participation in the space's operations should be encouraged.
 
−
 
 
−
=== Noteworthy caveats ===
 
−
 
 
−
* Members do not have the ability to vote to break the law. See [[Bylaws#Issues Proper for a Vote of the Membership]].
 
−
 
 
−
== Language ==
 
  
 
[[Category:Votes]]
 
[[Category:Votes]]
 
[[Category:2015 Votes]]
 
[[Category:2015 Votes]]

Revision as of 06:43, 13 July 2015

Sponsors

  • hef

History

  • 2015-04-22 - Inception
  • 2015-05-05 - Discussion w/ BoD
  • 2015-05-07 - Draft 3 rewrite
  • 2015-05-19 - Language Lockdown (planned)
  • 2015-05-26 - Vote (planned)

Background

The following "policies" are improper for a vote of directors, as they deal with insurance compliance, and not the health of the organization.

and are ineffective for controlling member behavior inside the space. This vote is to relabel those votes as JFDI member contributed policy, and allow them to be modified as appropriate for a given situation.


Language

The following 3 polciies are cute, but are better labeled as JFDI policy:

Retrieved from "https://ps1.mywikis.wiki/w/index.php?title=Vote_on_3_Policy_Labels&oldid=24580"