Difference between revisions of "Vote on 3 Policy Labels"

Revision as of 15:55, 28 July 2015

I have never seen the membership and the board as to distinct groups.

As they are written, if a non-board member of the organization wanted to work on insurance compliance, I would be inclined to encourage them.

The following 3 policies could be seen as an obstacle to that.

The policy structure at PS:One can be convoluted and difficult to follow, so I write a hand-dandy guide available here: Understanding Policy Structure at PS:One

The following 3 policies are member curated policies.

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 == Background ==
-The following "policies" are improper for a vote of directors, as they deal with insurance compliance, and not the health of the organization.
+I have never seen the membership and the board as to distinct groups.
+As they are written, if a non-board member of the organization wanted to work on insurance compliance, I would be inclined to encourage them.
+The following 3 policies could be seen as an obstacle to that.
 * [[Board Policy on Animals]]
 * [[Board Policy on Alcohol]]
 * [[Board Policy on Events]]
-and are ineffective for controlling member behavior inside the space. This vote is to relabel those votes as JFDI member contributed policy, and allow them to be modified as appropriate for a given situation.