1,183
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + +
Talk:Membership Rewards Points Vote (view source)
Revision as of 15:06, 16 October 2014
, 15:06, 16 October 2014→Class Size
I believe I understand the motivation of issuing a point even if only a single person shows up. I am not, however, a fan of the idea. I'd rather see 3 as a minimum. It sucks when no one shows up for your event, but I also believe that member points are not the sole reason for hosting classes. --[[User:Dbever|Dbever]] ([[User talk:Dbever|talk]]) 09:33, 16 October 2014 (CDT)
I believe I understand the motivation of issuing a point even if only a single person shows up. I am not, however, a fan of the idea. I'd rather see 3 as a minimum. It sucks when no one shows up for your event, but I also believe that member points are not the sole reason for hosting classes. --[[User:Dbever|Dbever]] ([[User talk:Dbever|talk]]) 09:33, 16 October 2014 (CDT)
I also take issue with that section. I actually take a lot of issue with making the points "automatic", without giving the board any discretion in the matter. Someone could conceivably fulfill the requirements of putting on a "class" with one person in attendance, and demand a member point in return, and without giving any discretion to the board on whether or not they should qualify, they would be forced to comply. At least add some language that says something like "it is up to the discretion of the BoD whether or not a class actually qualifies for a point." We generally try to put smart people on the board, so we should take advantage of that. ;-) [[User:Justin|Justin]] ([[User talk:Justin|talk]]) 10:06, 16 October 2014 (CDT)