844
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + + + + + +
Talk:Membership Rewards Points Vote (view source)
Revision as of 14:33, 16 October 2014
, 14:33, 16 October 2014no edit summary
Can we remove the language that mentions "time credits". I wouldn't want to give the impression that this is a tangible thing that needs to be tracked. It's one of those things that will just end up being more work for the board. Just say that time spent authorizing is cumulative, and that members claiming points need to inform the board when they have gone over the limit to earn a point. [[User:Justin|Justin]] ([[User talk:Justin|talk]]) 01:01, 16 October 2014 (CDT)
Can we remove the language that mentions "time credits". I wouldn't want to give the impression that this is a tangible thing that needs to be tracked. It's one of those things that will just end up being more work for the board. Just say that time spent authorizing is cumulative, and that members claiming points need to inform the board when they have gone over the limit to earn a point. [[User:Justin|Justin]] ([[User talk:Justin|talk]]) 01:01, 16 October 2014 (CDT)
This whole section is pretty complicated. I generally prefer to implement the minimum viable language to get the job done - complicated policies mean people have to look them up frequently. --[[User:Dbever|Dbever]] ([[User talk:Dbever|talk]]) 09:33, 16 October 2014 (CDT)
=== Class Size ===
I believe I understand the motivation of issuing a point even if only a single person shows up. I am not, however, a fan of the idea. I'd rather see 3 as a minimum. It sucks when no one shows up for your event, but I also believe that member points are not the sole reason for hosting classes. --[[User:Dbever|Dbever]] ([[User talk:Dbever|talk]]) 09:33, 16 October 2014 (CDT)