Difference between revisions of "Vote to Refresh PS:One Server Hardware"
m (Robot: Cosmetic changes) |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
− | The primary IT services in the space are running on ageing hardware and an undersized battery backup. | + | The primary IT services in the space are running on ageing hardware and an undersized battery backup. Thanks to the explosion of "cloud" service providers, we can replace these with newer second hand systems that are both more powerful _and_ consume significantly less power. |
Hypothetically, the power requirements for this hardware could go from the current total of 1300 Watts to < 300 Watts based on Hef's measurements here: | Hypothetically, the power requirements for this hardware could go from the current total of 1300 Watts to < 300 Watts based on Hef's measurements here: | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
This is a potential alternative to upgrading the [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/Vote_to_buy_a_new_UPS UPS] with the added benefit of removing a kilowatt of power consumption and heat disipation in the catwalk area. | This is a potential alternative to upgrading the [https://wiki.pumpingstationone.org/Vote_to_buy_a_new_UPS UPS] with the added benefit of removing a kilowatt of power consumption and heat disipation in the catwalk area. | ||
− | Assuming $0.07 per KWh as the fully loaded electricity price, this migration will save roughly $600 per year in energy cost. | + | Assuming $0.07 per KWh as the fully loaded electricity price, this migration will save roughly $600 per year in energy cost. We'll also likely be able to recover a few hundred dollars by selling the old equipment. |
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" |
Revision as of 07:40, 24 December 2014
Sponsors
History
- Mailing List Announcement: 15-December-2014
- Officially Proposed: 15-December-2014
- To be Voted on: TBD (Delayed due to end of FY14 concerns and holiday availability)
- Yes:
- No:
- Present:
Background
The primary IT services in the space are running on ageing hardware and an undersized battery backup. Thanks to the explosion of "cloud" service providers, we can replace these with newer second hand systems that are both more powerful _and_ consume significantly less power.
Hypothetically, the power requirements for this hardware could go from the current total of 1300 Watts to < 300 Watts based on Hef's measurements here:
This is a potential alternative to upgrading the UPS with the added benefit of removing a kilowatt of power consumption and heat disipation in the catwalk area.
Assuming $0.07 per KWh as the fully loaded electricity price, this migration will save roughly $600 per year in energy cost. We'll also likely be able to recover a few hundred dollars by selling the old equipment.
product | price |
---|---|
Dell C6100/DCS6005 3 x node mini-cluster - spec for each node - 48 GB RAM - 12 x 1.8 GHz cores - 4 x 1 TB SATA drives | $1184.99 + $30 shiping = $1214.99 |
TP-LINK TL-SG1016 - 16-Port Gigabit rackmountable - 13 Watt maximum power consumption | $78 |
Total + 20% buffer | $ $1551 |
Language
Authorize the BoD to spend up to $1551 on acquiring replacement low power server hardware for the PS1 IT infrastructure
This authorization shall expire at midnight on March 1, 2015.